<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Job scanners: embracing a really enticing, really bad idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonseiden.com/job-scanners-embracing-a-really-enticing-really-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonseiden.com/job-scanners-embracing-a-really-enticing-really-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>My Blog is Profersonal™.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Job scanners: embracing a really enticing, really bad idea — Jason Seiden -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://jasonseiden.com/job-scanners-embracing-a-really-enticing-really-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-7522</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Job scanners: embracing a really enticing, really bad idea — Jason Seiden -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonseiden.com/?p=82#comment-7522</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason Seiden, Dustin. Dustin said: RT @Seiden Why @penelopetrunk &#039;s take about job hoppers&#039; advantage is dead wrong. http://bit.ly/cX4YeS &lt;---Schizo interests vs. schizo CV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason Seiden, Dustin. Dustin said: RT @Seiden Why @penelopetrunk &#39;s take about job hoppers&#39; advantage is dead wrong. <a href="http://bit.ly/cX4YeS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cX4YeS</a> &lt;&#8212;Schizo interests vs. schizo CV [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Seiden</title>
		<link>http://jasonseiden.com/job-scanners-embracing-a-really-enticing-really-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-7521</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Seiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonseiden.com/?p=82#comment-7521</guid>
		<description>Amen to that, Dustin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that, Dustin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://jasonseiden.com/job-scanners-embracing-a-really-enticing-really-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-7520</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonseiden.com/?p=82#comment-7520</guid>
		<description>The reality is, for those of us Renaissance men and women who require, nay, demand an interesting work life, the best bet is to kick unquestionable ass at something we know we love, and let the new opportunities and challenges that come through successive successes (can I say that?) keep it interesting.  That&#039;s not to say it&#039;s unhealthy to work for different companies over one&#039;s career.  But a lot of people my age or younger are in danger of believing that it&#039;s okay to build a resume where you have to include only years on Linkedin because nothing crosses the 12 month mark.

Well said, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reality is, for those of us Renaissance men and women who require, nay, demand an interesting work life, the best bet is to kick unquestionable ass at something we know we love, and let the new opportunities and challenges that come through successive successes (can I say that?) keep it interesting.  That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s unhealthy to work for different companies over one&#8217;s career.  But a lot of people my age or younger are in danger of believing that it&#8217;s okay to build a resume where you have to include only years on Linkedin because nothing crosses the 12 month mark.</p>
<p>Well said, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

