Jason Seiden: My blog is profersonal. BLOG  |  PODCAST  |  BOOKS  |  WORKFORCE MARKETING  |  CONTACT
 

The Secret to Using Twitter

July 9, 2011

Twitter is a non-linear, hyper-speed form of communication that makes no sense to the analytical mind. The secret to using Twitter is to recognize that what you’re experiencing is a direct pipeline into other peoples’ internal dialogue. Twitter is a digital tool that lets you read their minds.

Tweets are ideas without explanation

Tweets are thought fragments. When we talk to ourselves, we don’t use a lot of set up; we don’t explain to ourselves where thoughts and ideas come from. They just sort of pop into our heads. At 140 characters, tweets are the thoughts that have popped into other peoples’ heads, without the explanation we tend to wrap around ideas when communicating them to others.

The analytical mind doesn’t like this. The analytical mind wants thoughts communicated to it linearly, in a “tell me what you’re going to tell me, tell me, then tell me what you told me” sort of way.

That way takes too long and is unnecessary. Try to keep up here.

The value of tweets is often more in their context than their content

The value of a tweet like, “Earthquake’s over; I’m safe.” is clearly in the content. But what about a tweet like the one below?

Do I care that Mark’s sitting on the tarmac? That he hasn’t slept? That he’s talking with someone named “bostonwriter”? From a content standpoint, probably not, but that’s just the analytical side of our brains poo-poohing a communication it doesn’t understand. From a context standpoint, this tweet is gold: it’s a doorway to a friendship. Think about how you make and maintain friendships: by taking an interest in someone’s life and reacting. By picking sides and letting someone know, “Hey, I’m on your side.” Now quiet your analytical mind and consider this tweet the same way you’d consider a comment by a buddy over a beer. When I do that, a number potential responses become possible:

  • “Hey, Mark, how was Boston?”
  • “Glad to be back at SFO?”
  • “Hey, my home airport is ORD—tell me about it!”
  • “Successful trip?”
  • “Was the trip business or pleasure?”
  • “I’ll be in SFO in two weeks; grab a drink?”
  • “I can’t do those all nighters anymore; my body crashes.”
  • “I remember when all nighters were a badge of honor. Now they’re just a pain in the ass!”

With all of these, the content of the conversation is no more important than the content of the conversation you have with friends over dinner or while watching a game. It’s the context of the conversation that matters instead. But try telling that to your analytical mind!

Tweets are frenetic

If you try to sit down and read all the tweets from everyone you follow starting from the last time you logged in until now, you’ll fry. Twitter is a direct pipeline into peoples’ minds, and minds move too fast for that. There’s also a lot of noise you don’t care about. (If I could read all my readers’ minds right now, I bet a good percentage of them would be thinking about either their last or their next meal!) When I talk with someone, I don’t back them up to our last conversation and ask them to share every thought they’ve had since then. I just glean what I can from our conversation in the moment, and then move on. Twitter needs to be approached the same way: when you engage, you’re getting a snapshot of what people are thinking in that moment. Look at the photo, decide to engage or not, and move on. Will you miss good stuff? Yep. But you’ll find good stuff, too, and you won’t go crazy in the process.

Turn off your analytical mind!

That’s the secret to Twitter. Of course, learning to communicate less analytically takes time. From my experience and from the data I’ve seen, it can take about a year to figure this out. After that, you’ll know how to read minds (digitally).

And here’s the really interesting part: when I ask people if they think Twitter is worth a year learning curve, a lot of people shrug. They don’t know. But if I ask if they’d invest a year to learn how to read minds, they say, “Of course!” Well, there you go. Twitter is digital telepathy. Start using it now, and you’re a year away from reading minds.

 
Jason Seiden is CEO of Ajax Workforce Marketing. Ajax amplifies brands by aligning employees' online messaging.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Controlling the Message — Seiden
September 16, 2011 at 10:20 am
The secret to using Twitter for analytical minds
May 8, 2012 at 5:18 am

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

Dean Carlton July 10, 2011 at 4:46 am

Hi Jason,

Great point – I’ve never really thought of Twitter conversations quiet like that (chatting to a buddy over beer!).

Thanks for sharing – I will be bringing that approach to my use of Twitter, expecting things to move on to the next level in terms of engagement.

I am a “Profersonal” too! (Love that name!).

Kind regards,
Dean.

Vernita Bridges Hoyt July 10, 2011 at 7:40 am

Best explanation I’ve ever read about how to use Twitter. Thanks!

Khaled July 10, 2011 at 4:00 pm

nice post I bookmarked it thanks

Jason Seiden July 10, 2011 at 9:14 pm

@Khaled—Shokran.

Jason Seiden July 11, 2011 at 11:45 am

@Vernita—Thanks!

Jason Seiden July 11, 2011 at 11:45 am

@Dean—Thanks. It’s amazing how a small shift in perspective can open up a whole new world of possibilities.

Peter Walts July 13, 2011 at 7:39 am

Twitter demystified…..thx Jason! pw

SIndoora July 18, 2011 at 3:01 am

You know, I’ve always been a little apprehensive about using Twitter. I am pretty active on Facebook. And I like using it because its more like a way to stay in touch. And it gives you so many ways of keeping people ‘engaged’.
But on Twitter, its about what you have to say. As it turns out, I’m not a ‘philosopher’. I don’t always have ‘important’ things to say. And I can be really random (bordering on obscure). And I wasn’t sure why (or if) people will be interested in my random musings or doings.
But thank you for this post. Twitter is starting to make a little more sense now. And maybe I’ll try and give it a shot. :)

- Sindoora

Elissa Jane Mastel July 18, 2011 at 10:05 am

great way to breakdown the Twitter stream of consciousness! I reposted this on our twitter feed @jpatrickjobs

Jason Seiden July 22, 2011 at 8:18 am

Sindoora—I wouldn’t worry too much why (or if) people will be interested in you. Maybe they will, maybe they won’t. So what? It’s not like you’re looking for a different audience online from the one you have in the real world… also, frankly, the online philosophers bore me. I know they’re popular, but I find that a great deal of stuff that passes for philosophical on Twitter feels trite to me. The stuff I react to is often esoteric and not “popular” at all.

Jason Seiden July 22, 2011 at 8:19 am

Elissa, thank you!

Ken Gardner May 20, 2012 at 11:32 pm

I disagree with one part of this article. In my opinion, if a public tweet requires additional context outside the tweet for readers to understand it correctly, it is probably not worth tweeting.

Jason Seiden May 21, 2012 at 9:14 am

@Ken—You got me thinking. Here’s where got stuck:

Biographers, working with an entire lifetime’s worth of communication, often disagree on a person’s intent… How am I supposed to eliminate ambiguity with only 140 characters at my disposal?

You’ve got me curious—I’d like to see if I can get to a point where I agree with you… not there yet… help me out?

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: