<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s All Tell the Truth, OK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonseiden.com/what-if-everyone-told-the-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonseiden.com/what-if-everyone-told-the-truth/</link>
	<description>My Blog is Profersonal™.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Human Capital Vendor Space: Rants, Rulings and Ramblings by J. William Tincup, Starr Tincup &#124; &#187; The Daily Briefing &#8211; June 29, 2010</title>
		<link>http://jasonseiden.com/what-if-everyone-told-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-8086</link>
		<dc:creator>The Human Capital Vendor Space: Rants, Rulings and Ramblings by J. William Tincup, Starr Tincup &#124; &#187; The Daily Briefing &#8211; June 29, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonseiden.com/?p=4780#comment-8086</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Seiden [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Seiden [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://jasonseiden.com/what-if-everyone-told-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-8081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonseiden.com/?p=4780#comment-8081</guid>
		<description>Ed, Culbert&#039;s onto something there. Thanks for sharing, and my continued best as you strive to stay in that magical zone called &quot;being responsible with the truth&quot;—not always an easy place to find, let alone reside in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, Culbert&#8217;s onto something there. Thanks for sharing, and my continued best as you strive to stay in that magical zone called &#8220;being responsible with the truth&#8221;—not always an easy place to find, let alone reside in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://jasonseiden.com/what-if-everyone-told-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-8080</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonseiden.com/?p=4780#comment-8080</guid>
		<description>UCLA prof Samuel Culbert has an interesting way of looking at this in his book &quot;Beyond Bullsh*t; Straight Talk at Work.&quot;  Knowing the corporate/legal/political obstacles you mention (and others), he separates the concept into three areas:

Truth talking -- specific to the moment
Candor -- specific to the issue
Straight talk -- specific to the relationship

In the case of the new intitiative, candor is what&#039;s needed:  &quot;It may be a great idea, but the timing is not ideal...etc.&quot;  You sending a message that is as candid as possible given the restraints as you know them.

In the case of the wedding dress, I suppose the relationship the bride has (or wants to have) with her future mother-in-law will dictate the approach as much as the specific issue/moment.  

PR people often face this dilemma with good reporters.  They may know of an impending announcement, but can&#039;t confirm it when a reporter who has gotten the scoop calls to verify.  Can&#039;t tell the truth.  But can&#039;t lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UCLA prof Samuel Culbert has an interesting way of looking at this in his book &#8220;Beyond Bullsh*t; Straight Talk at Work.&#8221;  Knowing the corporate/legal/political obstacles you mention (and others), he separates the concept into three areas:</p>
<p>Truth talking &#8212; specific to the moment<br />
Candor &#8212; specific to the issue<br />
Straight talk &#8212; specific to the relationship</p>
<p>In the case of the new intitiative, candor is what&#8217;s needed:  &#8220;It may be a great idea, but the timing is not ideal&#8230;etc.&#8221;  You sending a message that is as candid as possible given the restraints as you know them.</p>
<p>In the case of the wedding dress, I suppose the relationship the bride has (or wants to have) with her future mother-in-law will dictate the approach as much as the specific issue/moment.  </p>
<p>PR people often face this dilemma with good reporters.  They may know of an impending announcement, but can&#8217;t confirm it when a reporter who has gotten the scoop calls to verify.  Can&#8217;t tell the truth.  But can&#8217;t lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

